Skip to main content
On Demand

"Switching Hats" - Managing Mixed Modes Arbitration and Mediation


Total Credits: 2 CLE

Average Rating:
   12
Categories:
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Original Program Date:
May 12, 2022


Description

Just how far should arbitrators go in setting the stage for settlement?  Suppose you are the arbitrator in a business dispute, and midway through hearings the lawyers come to you and ask that you “switch hats” and mediate the matter?  Or in another case, what if it was proposed that you attempt to mediate a settlement, and, if mediation was unsuccessful, that you render an arbitration award based on one or the other of the parties’ final offers?   Would you agree to such “mixed-mode” arrangements, and, if so, under what conditions? Although many dispute resolution professionals would decline the opportunity, many other arbitrators and mediators have experience switching hats during dispute resolution.  Recently, U.S. and international task forces have developed practical guidance for neutrals, lawyers and parties considering these and other mixed-mode options.  In this highly interactive program, Prof. Tom Stipanowich, JAMS arbitrator and mediator and long-time director of Pepperdine’s famed Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution, and Renee Gerstman,  AAA and private arbitrator and mediator, will engage participants in a series of real-life scenarios that explore the potential opportunities and pitfalls of such options and identify key tools and insights for future practice.   

Faculty:
Professor Thomas Stipanowich, Pepperdine University
Renee Gerstman, Gerstman Law

Handouts

Reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Overall:      4.3

Total Reviews: 12

Comments

Lance M

"The presentation materials were good. This is not a bad rating."

Matthew P

"Everything was great, some of the materials were hard to read, but speakers did a fine job."

Laurel H

"This may have been a better CLE when participating in-person. On demand, however, the polling exercises felt like a waste of time. I also prefer hearing presentations where questions are held until the end. Here, questions were taken throughout and led to repeated statements of "we'll get to that later." I felt like there wasn't a logical flow due to the questions dictating the presentation. "

Keith K

"This was one of the most confuesed online MCLE presentations I've ever subscribed to. "

David T

"Really well planned and presented. Very enjoyable. "