Skip to main content
On Demand

Probate Court Appointed Counsel and Guardians Ad Litem Training


Total Credits: 3 CLE

Average Rating:
   21
Categories:
Probate & Estate Planning
Faculty:
Denice Shepherd |  Hillary Gagnon |  Hon. Dean M Fink |  Michael J Doyle |  Joshua Mozell
Original Program Date:
Nov 30, 2022


Description

 

Pursuant to the mandate of Rule 10 of the Arizona Rules of Probate Procedure, all court-appointed counsel and guardians ad litem must complete this three-hour initial training course before taking on your first case.
Experienced practitioners will lead discussions on the issues court-appointed counsel (CAC) and guardians ad litem (GAL) are facing.

Topics will include:     • Rule and Statute Updates for CAC and GALs and a general view from the bench
    • CAC/GAL Appointments beyond initial appointment proceedings:
        ? Representing ward/protected persons in litigation and personal injury settlement
        ? Visitation disputes
        ? Conservator's use of protected persons funds and assets
        ? Investigation to protect the ward when fiduciary does not comply with court orders
        ? Family disputes

 

  • Intersection of Title 14 and Title 36 and CAC/GAL's Role


Chair
Hillary Gagnon, Stacey L. Johnson, PLLC

Faculty 
Judge Dean Fink, Maricopa County Superior Court
Michael Doyle, Baumann Doyle Paytas & Bernstein
Joshua Mozell, Mozell Law Group, P.L.L.C.
Denice Shepherd, Law Office of Denice R Shepherd PC

Handouts

Faculty



Hon. Dean M Fink Related Seminars and Products

Maricopa County Superior Court


Judge Dean M. Fink is the Presiding Judge of the Probate and Mental Health Department of the Maricopa County Superior Court. He has been on the Superior Court bench since June 2004. He began his judicial career as a commissioner. In August 2007, Governor Janet Napolitano appointed him as a judge. In addition to Probate/Mental Health, Judge Fink has served in the Family, Civil and Criminal departments of the Superior Court. He was also the Presiding Judge of the Arizona Tax Court from 2009 to 2014. Judge Fink currently serves on the Judicial Performance Review Commission of the Arizona Supreme Court. He previously served on the State Bar of Arizona’s Civil Practice and Procedure Committee, the Arizona Supreme Court’s Fiduciary Board, the Board of Directors of the Arts & Business Council of Greater Phoenix, the University of Arizona Student Life National Leadership Board, and the State Bar of Arizona’s Communications Advisory Committee. Judge Fink received his undergraduate degree in 1990 from the University of Arizona, where he served as the student body president. He received his law degree from the Columbia University School of Law in 1993. Prior to joining the bench, he worked at the law firms of Fennemore Craig, Kirkland and Ellis, and Lewis and Roca.


Michael J Doyle Related Seminars and Products

Baumann Doyle Paytas & Bernstein



Reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Overall:      4.2

Total Reviews: 21

Comments

Danalyn S

"It was interesting and helpful. I had just spent the last year on the bench and learned COT/COE so that part was basic review. It would have been nice to have more on the Title 14 stuff."

Zachary T

"The information provided was interesting and helpful. But I would have liked a broader discussion of serving as court appointed counsel in general, including considerations for meeting with client before and representing client at initial hearing. This presentation seemed to jump into specific examples and updates without first providing more general training for court appointed counsel. "

William M

"The seminar was very informative but the materials for the first section were lacking. Mozell was informative and his materials were good but he was quiet."

Kandace W

"For my needs it was good info, but would like more of Josh Mozell's type of process to work through this system."

Kenneth M

"Good information"

Sandra G

"The course was supposed to be training for Court Appointed Attorneys and GALs and the court gave little to no direction on the processes involved. Instead it dealt with more complex issues in these areas."

Lauri O

"these are exactly what I need to understand what I am doing. I wish there was more on the Title 36 appointment though specifically."