Skip to main content
eBook

2025 Arizona Election Law Refresher


Average Rating:
   17
Categories:
Public Lawyers |  Administrative Law


Description

With a new presidential administration underway, we will likely see many new federal and state election-related developments in the months to come. 
This seminar will provide an overview of recent election law developments, as well as a series of practical tips for the election law attorney. Please join us for this informative, useful, and entertaining seminar.


Topics will include:

  • New State and Federal Election Litigation Developments
  • Current Issues Affecting Proof of Citizenship Requirements
  • Ethics Presentation, Including Attorney Sanctions and New Ethics Rules Governing Government Attorneys
  • Miscellaneous Updates on Campaign Finance, the Election Procedures Manual, and other Election Law Developments.

 
Seminar Co-Chairs:
Sarah R. Gonski, Everett Street Group PLLC
Eric H. Spencer, Snell & Wilmer LLP

Seminar Faculty:
Adrian Fontes, Arizona Secretary of State
Daniel Arellano, Herrera Arellano
Rhonda Barnes, Arizona House of Representatives
James Barton, Barton Mendez Soto
Amy Chan, Arizona Secretary of State's Office
Alexis Danneman, Perkins Coie
Luke Douglas, Arizona Secretary of State's Office
Andrew Gaona, Coppersmith Brockelman
Sarah Gonski, Everett Street Group PLLC
Andy Gould, Holtzman Vogel
Karen Hartman-Tellez, Arizona Attorney General's Office
Kara Karlson, Attorney General’s Office
Joshua Kredit, Arizona State Senate
Rebecca Layne, Holtzman Vogel
Tracy Olson, Snell and Wilmer
Eric Spencer, Snell and Wilmer
Josh Whitaker, Arizona Attorney General’s Office

Reviews

5
4
3
2
1

Overall:      4.5

Total Reviews: 17

Comments

Jeffrey J

"No"

Joseph A

"interesting and thorough "

George D

"Incredible panel. Covered a huge amount of material."

Michele F

"There's so much election litigation and legislation in AZ. This was a fantastic overview and the program materials are also very helpful. "

Jo M

"Covered a lot of issues over the course of the presentation."

Stephen M

"Diverse topics and experience. Well worth the time."

Kyle C

"The presenters had extensive knowledge about the subject matter, and were able to present it in an easily understandable form."

Natalie K

"Great range and good pacing"

Sarah G

"All the presenters should've had slides. And the slides featuring cases should have said what the holding or procedural status is"

Lori E

"Some of the topics needed more time to fully cover. Rushed sometimes. "