Comments

Randi B

"Topics either did not apply or were contained a lot of the same information. "

Kyle F

"It was very helpful. The pacing was a little rough at times."

Gregory H

"Several of the presentations were pressed for time and went far too quickly or skipped over some of their materials"

Barry D

"Some of the presentations were not engaging and lacked continuity."

Tonya M

"In person seminars have greater value. "

Christa B

"A few topics would only be relevant to a small amount of viewers, others were fairly entry level. the sections done by Judge Avelar, Keith Berkshire, and the Hot Tips panel were very good though"

Nicholas B

"Poor presentation of materials, which seem slapped together. Ineffecient use of technology. Interruption of speakers by moderators. I feel that in-person, the quality of presentations have been better in the past."

Daniel W

"Very caselaw focused. "

Aris G

"Great seminar."

Kaela G

"Very informative on a variety of applicable topics"