Comments

Isabella P

"VERY informative and well presented! The speakers were amazing; I wish I can give them a 10 on the scale of 1 to 5! Thank you for organizing this CLE!"

John P

"Relevant, timely content delivered in an interesting and understandable way."

Joel L

"The presentation was not too technical but did give me information I did not previously have (and provided a framework for more review)."

Teresa M

"Somewhat vague at times."

Dennis O

"The still very unknown nature of the subject matter limits the ability to provide an "excellent" program. That being said, the presenters were good and engaging and walked the line of accepting, embracing, and fearing the technology."

Dara D

"The presenters offered timely and complete information"

Michelle R

"IT WAS HELPFUL BUT THE AREA IS STILL DEVELOPING SO FAST. I HOPE THERE IS AN UPDATE."

Danielle J

"Interesting material. Was looking for more concrete examples how disclose use to clients and minimize/manage risks of use. "

Lawton J

" I was disappointed to hear Mr. Lamber's repeated use of the word dangerous, his examples of the most rudimentary interaction with AI (Asking AI substantive questions about its intent) and his discussion of hallucinations instead of explaining gaps in data that occur in algorithms. The information in the presentation felt dated. Fennemore Craig is usually pretty cutting edge with technology - I would have liked to hear more from Mr. Lamber's real world experiences with it."