|
|
Joseph I"Paul Bender is a distinguished scholar, but his presentation was (to be candid) awful. His time management was poor, he was repetitive to the point of distraction, and combative rather than a more neutral presenter. The other presenters were all excellent. " |
|
|
Gretchen J"well prepared speakers, multiple speakers which was helpful to keeping attention, informative." |
|
|
Scott S"Some of the cases could have received deeper analysis. Dobbs was repetitive. " |
|
|
Daniel A"Paul Bender was really good. The rest were somewhat uneven." |
|
|
Marcus B"excellent" |
|
|
K G"relevant material" |
|
|
Robert M"Excellent speakers. Well organized. Excellent Moderator. " |
|
|
Elisabeth F"Very informative, enjoyed the multiple presenters." |