Comments

Emi K

"The first two hours were very informative, but the final hour felt less organized. I would have appreciated if Honorable O'Neil refreshed his memory about the outcomes of certain examples of disciplinary cases because the information he shared felt incomplete without knowing the actual outcomes of the disciplinary action. "

Susan L

"somewhat informative could be more specific"

John B

"presenters were clear and concise"

Stephen K

"The vicissitudes of client representation and the court cases involved does not comport with the paradigm espoused by the speakers. Criminal law is much different. Some good food for thought, but applicability to criminal law is hard to find here. "

Fernanda M

"everything was clear."

Rick A

"The panel was very informative and shared content that I felt was very applicable to me and my practice. The panel was knowledgeable, but also entertaining. "