|
Joseph C"As always, never enough time to cover everything. However, I believe the instructors did a great job of presenting the materials with the time they had. Further, I did enjoy the hypotheticals that were presented." |
|
Lora P"Very dynamic discussion, easy to follow and great chemistry between the two speakers" |
|
John P"Fast-paced lots of information, all topics covered are relevant in today's regulatory environment." |
|
Myra H"All of the information was new to me. The structure of the seminar included hypotheticals which reinforced the information that was discussed. The slide contained a great deal of information. However the size of the font on the materials was such that it was difficult to read, particularly for people with visual impairments. " |
|
Thomas S"It would have been easier to follow with more slides tracking oral statements" |
|
Joseph N"Very complete, and appreciated that the attendees may not understand all the governmental parties." |
|
Nicholas C"The program did a good job of incorporating hypotheticals and real word examples to expand upon certain legal concepts." |
|
Amy R"So much info and it was clear and easy to understand and I think they held back. " |
|
Kirsten L"Great presenters and great handouts. Sara and Clark were understandable and made sense" |
|
Helena B"The presentation was overall good. " |