|
Lauren W
"Very clear, concise presentation of information from the speakers."
|
|
Theresa R
"excellent speakers"
|
|
Jessica B
"Hypotheticals were good, but would have like to go through the specific rules too. "
|
|
Neil M
"Well prepared, well presented, and on point. "
|
|
Micah A
"Very informative, but quite rushed."
|
|
Nicole K
"There was not enough discussion of what the rule changes were with respect to government attorneys. While the language changes to the rules and advisory language were included at the end of the materials, none of the speakers showed the actual changes themselves.
The hypotheticals would have been more helpful had I understood what the actual changes to the rules are. It was harder to follow that discussion of those hypotheticals without that context. One hour may be insufficient for this."
|
|
Dezarai F
"The presentation did not feel smooth or cohesive; The examples did not seem to really draw on changes in an indepth way. The information did not seem to be insightful in the changes beyond what was provided in the summary or could be read from the rule itsself"
|
|
Elizabeth C
"Really well-qualified speakers. I know this is a required CLE credit, but as a government lawyer there aren't nearly enough CLEs dedicated to our particular practice. Thank you for putting this one on! There were tech problems, but that happens. Thank you for making the missed portion available to view on video (which I just finished watching)"
|
|
Kimberly H
"A lot of information; helpful"
|
|
Kevin S
"The speakers were knowledgeable and presented the information in a clear manner."
|