|
|
Janice F"Good information, succinctly covered" |
|
|
Brody A"Informative and to the point." |
|
|
Colby S"Seems like it was not really meant for Federal Government attorneys. The part that was, at the beginning, seemed to mischaracterize the relationship between Executive Agency attorneys and DoJ attorneys by misconstruing the "unitary executive" theory. The written materials correctly couch that theory in a federal litigation context, where it is true: DoJ represents the US, and Agency counsel assist; however, the presenter suggested Agency counsel work for the AG, which is Constitutionally false" |
|
|
Leonnesia F"Content was easy to understand." |
|
|
Scott E"Great information. Well presented." |
|
|
Clifton P"The information was well presented." |
|
|
Laura G"Clear, easy to understand, great pace and helpful examples." |
|
|
Augustina S"Good Hypotheticals" |
|
|
Laura F"good presenters easy to follow " |
|
|
Jody S"Knowledgeable panel ." |