|
John T
"Discussed different types of gov lawyers that is not well explained in the rule changes."
|
|
Joseph L
"Good overview of the rules and helpful, practical examples highlighting the challenges of representing the US Govt as a client."
|
|
Felecia R
"expertise of the presenters and the examples and discussion"
|
|
Stephen W
"All good / no bad. Required content, so it is what it is."
|
|
Megan M
"This was a very brief and high level overview but it seemed to raise a lot of questions but there was not time to answer. It would have been great to make this a little longer session to get a chance to hear responses to additional questions. "
|
|
Bradford P
"The rules are still pretty vague to me, but perhaps that's the rules' fault, not the presenters'. Hypothetical One seem to beg a lot of questions."
|
|
Mary F
"Overall information about what my organization and attorneys already have done for a few years now. Some of the faculty members could have been more succinct or articulate."
|
|
Jason G
"I don't know. The Federal Attorney guy was really good."
|
|
Karen P
"CLE conveyed useful information"
|
|
Gregory G
"It was well run"
|