|
|
Erin P"Should have a separate session for federal government employees" |
|
|
Sara D"The content was informative and presented by effective communicators. " |
|
|
Janna J"The panel included interesting hypotheticals and I appreciated the question answer session " |
|
|
Jessica F"I thought the CLE was well done, but I wish they gave more hypotheticals and talked about in-house government attorneys more. " |
|
|
Thomas D"The topic itself is somewhat dry." |
|
|
Anita S"Interesting but more on point with state govt employees" |
|
|
John T"Discussed different types of gov lawyers that is not well explained in the rule changes." |
|
|
Joseph L"Good overview of the rules and helpful, practical examples highlighting the challenges of representing the US Govt as a client." |
|
|
Felecia R"expertise of the presenters and the examples and discussion" |
|
|
Stephen W"All good / no bad. Required content, so it is what it is." |