|
|
Daniel M"covered new information about which I was not aware" |
|
|
Madison J"All the speakers were effective at explaining the rules and their applications. I think it would have been helpful to have more scenarios. " |
|
|
Scott C"Seemed like there was too much to cover in the allowed time period." |
|
|
Taila L"I really appreciated the hypotheticals that were provided and the in-depth discussion about each hypothetical. " |
|
|
Ryan H"As a federal government judicial law clerk, hard to undestand what all applied to me." |
|
|
Erin G"It felt a little rushed, could have probably been 1.5 or 2 hours." |
|
|
Anya M"There was a lot of information provided in a short period of time." |
|
|
Anna C"good hypos" |
|
|
Geoffrey D"Straight forward and real-life scenarios" |
|
|
Nathaniel W"Very difficult to understand because they kept referring to this rule or that rule. It was hard to follow at times because I don't have the expertise as the panelists to know exactly what number a rule is." |