|
Neil M
"Well prepared, well presented, and on point. "
|
|
Micah A
"Very informative, but quite rushed."
|
|
Nicole K
"There was not enough discussion of what the rule changes were with respect to government attorneys. While the language changes to the rules and advisory language were included at the end of the materials, none of the speakers showed the actual changes themselves.
The hypotheticals would have been more helpful had I understood what the actual changes to the rules are. It was harder to follow that discussion of those hypotheticals without that context. One hour may be insufficient for this."
|
|
Dezarai F
"The presentation did not feel smooth or cohesive; The examples did not seem to really draw on changes in an indepth way. The information did not seem to be insightful in the changes beyond what was provided in the summary or could be read from the rule itsself"
|
|
Elizabeth C
"Really well-qualified speakers. I know this is a required CLE credit, but as a government lawyer there aren't nearly enough CLEs dedicated to our particular practice. Thank you for putting this one on! There were tech problems, but that happens. Thank you for making the missed portion available to view on video (which I just finished watching)"
|
|
Kimberly H
"A lot of information; helpful"
|
|
Kevin S
"The speakers were knowledgeable and presented the information in a clear manner."
|
|
Paul K
"More practical application would have been helpful, for example guidance on who client reps are likely to be beyond the obvious highest level individuals in an agency."
|
|
Theresa F
"Except for the video issue in the beginning, useful and applicable information. "
|
|
Stephanie L
"good information, but could have done more examples."
|