|
|
Michael Y"It was a good presentation" |
|
|
Kimberly L"The panel members were knowledgeable and professional. The discussion of the hypotheticals was particularly helpful." |
|
|
John L"It provided the necessary information but I reserve the top rating for things that are particularly insightful or engaging. " |
|
|
Lisa B"Felt like it was super urgent information, some of which was N/A to fed gov attorneys. At the outset, esp with the oh my gosh you better do an engagement letter ASAP, they could have couched that as fed lawyers you are good. " |
|
|
Edward P"Thorough " |
|
|
Brian L"Very clear and pertinent. " |
|
|
Tara V"A good amount of information covered in short period of time." |
|
|
Michael C"Good info" |
|
|
Steven H"Good overview of rule changes " |
|
|
Liela M"Some of the information was not explained enough. It seemed the presenters were very familiar but not covering all the information." |