|
Ryan S
"Good substance"
|
|
Theresa R
"The first 30 mins was a NARF commercial. 99% of the audience knows NARF. Speaker blew off the question about water rights settlements, which is what the CLE was supposed to be about. "
|
|
Michelle H
"The information and materials were pertinent to my practice. I only wish more time was spent on the substantive information and less on what NARF is doing. Also, it would be nice to provide CLE credits for other jurisdictions."
|
|
Michael C
"A good overview of water law issues that wasn't too complicated or too simple. The slides were easy to read."
|
|
Mark R
"I could have dispensed with the NARF background history for more substantive legal information. I expected a more detailed update on current pending tribal water law issues. Too general as presented."
|