|
Theresa R"The first 30 mins was a NARF commercial. 99% of the audience knows NARF. Speaker blew off the question about water rights settlements, which is what the CLE was supposed to be about. " |
|
Michelle H"The information and materials were pertinent to my practice. I only wish more time was spent on the substantive information and less on what NARF is doing. Also, it would be nice to provide CLE credits for other jurisdictions." |
|
Michael C"A good overview of water law issues that wasn't too complicated or too simple. The slides were easy to read." |
|
Mark R"I could have dispensed with the NARF background history for more substantive legal information. I expected a more detailed update on current pending tribal water law issues. Too general as presented." |