|
Katie R
"It really distilled down the basis for constant cognizance of ethics in our lives and in our profession "
|
|
Matthew M
"It was good."
|
|
Lori M
"the speaker was engaging. My only feedback to make it better would be to limit the repetitive nature of some of the dialogue. We are all intelligent and saying something once, maybe twice is plenty for us to absorb the message"
|
|
James A
"It was clear and easy to understand."
|
|
Bill S
"The content of the seminar was great, but I had to rewatch two segments despite having timely clicked on every attendance check."
|
|
Bobby Y
"Useful perspective and actual cases from the State Bar of Arizona itself."
|
|
Kathryn K
"The content is helpful. Good reminders of why the codes exist and why adherence is critical to professionalism. I gave Daniel and excellent rating - however his tone gets to be quite scolding. I appreciate the sentiment, but it gets hard to listen to after a while. "
|
|
Scott M
"Great program"
|
|
Elijah R
"My notes, nearly 7 pages worth, are replete with repeated complaint about the same questions - I wish I knew more about "overlitigation," I wish there was more about dealing with porcupine pro se parties for whom there is no obligation to professionalism. Professionalism is as professionals do, but the presenter repeatedly complains we need to do better. More substance as to what professionalism looks like and less about what it doesn't look like would have been appreciated."
|
|
Martin D
"Knowledgeable presenter, excellent summary of the rules with real life examples"
|