|
Tony C
"Good discussion "
|
|
Tara Z
"I prefer when the moderator simply moderates. I would have liked it if he'd let the panelists talk more, rather than constantly weighing in. I came to this CLE for the panelists, not the moderator."
|
|
Larry F
"Concise and helpful presentation."
|
|
Megan W
"It was useful but they seemed to rush through the changes to the rules at the beginning but spent a ton of time on voir dire and preemptory challenges which is a bit misleading based on the title of the seminar. I rarely ever participate in trials so it was not too useful."
|
|
Richard S
"Would have liked more on other rules"
|
|
Danika M
"It was informative, and I valued having insight from judges on what they do/do not like to see. "
|
|
Ryan L
"The materials were useful but much of the material wasn't covered. While hearing personal stories is great, I'd like it to focus on rule updates. "
|
|
Howard C
"A majority of the program appeared to focus on Criminal Procedure, and this was a Civil Procedure Seminar"
|
|
Naiomy M
"Very informative and the examples really help to provide clarity. "
|
|
Robert E
"Speakers are knowledgeable and provide practical advice and tips on using the changes to the rules"
|